<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Permalinks and comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aimee.mychores.co.uk/2007/09/08/post/59/permalinks-and-comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aimee.mychores.co.uk/2007/09/08/post/59/permalinks-and-comments</link>
	<description>aimee&#039;s personal journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:14:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: http-36.livejournal.com-</title>
		<link>http://aimee.mychores.co.uk/2007/09/08/post/59/permalinks-and-comments/comment-page-1#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>http-36.livejournal.com-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 09:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aimee.mychores.co.uk/2007/09/08/post/59/#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Well it&#039;s been 12 hours since my comment and my friends page still shows this post in the same place with &#039;No comments yet&#039;.

I would&#039;ve been very surprised if it had worked seamlessly, given the number of blogs I read that try to draw RSS subscriber&#039;s attention to good comments but don&#039;t list the number of comments on the feed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it&#039;s been 12 hours since my comment and my friends page still shows this post in the same place with &#039;No comments yet&#039;.</p>
<p>I would&#039;ve been very surprised if it had worked seamlessly, given the number of blogs I read that try to draw RSS subscriber&#039;s attention to good comments but don&#039;t list the number of comments on the feed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aimee</title>
		<link>http://aimee.mychores.co.uk/2007/09/08/post/59/permalinks-and-comments/comment-page-1#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Aimee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 22:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aimee.mychores.co.uk/2007/09/08/post/59/#comment-165</guid>
		<description>After a bit of poking around ...

&lt;blockquote&gt;If the same &lt;guid&gt; tag is used for two items, then LiveJournal will interpret the second as an update to the first and edit the old entry, rather than creating a new one. The same applies to the &lt;link&gt; tag if different links are normally provided for each entry. On the other hand, if a new &lt;link&gt; or &lt;guid&gt; is given to an item in the feed when it is edited, this will cause LiveJournal to post a new version of the entry.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

http://www.livejournal.com/support/faqbrowse.bml?faqid=151

It doesn&#039;t explicitly state whether a change in the content tag (without a changed link/guid) causes an entry to re-appear at the top of your friends page, but i don&#039;t think it does. Let me know if it does, please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a bit of poking around &#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>If the same &lt;guid&gt; tag is used for two items, then LiveJournal will interpret the second as an update to the first and edit the old entry, rather than creating a new one. The same applies to the &lt;link&gt; tag if different links are normally provided for each entry. On the other hand, if a new &lt;link&gt; or &lt;guid&gt; is given to an item in the feed when it is edited, this will cause LiveJournal to post a new version of the entry.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.livejournal.com/support/faqbrowse.bml?faqid=151" rel="nofollow">http://www.livejournal.com/support/faqbrowse.bml?faqid=151</a></p>
<p>It doesn&#039;t explicitly state whether a change in the content tag (without a changed link/guid) causes an entry to re-appear at the top of your friends page, but i don&#039;t think it does. Let me know if it does, please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aimee</title>
		<link>http://aimee.mychores.co.uk/2007/09/08/post/59/permalinks-and-comments/comment-page-1#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Aimee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 21:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aimee.mychores.co.uk/2007/09/08/post/59/#comment-164</guid>
		<description>I think (though i may be incorrect) that LJ will not re-post the entry unless the permalink changes. If i am incorrect i will take off the &quot;n comments&quot; part. I only included it because the plugin offered it, but i think it&#039;s a bit pointless really, as it is likely to be wrong whenever the feed hasn&#039;t updated yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think (though i may be incorrect) that LJ will not re-post the entry unless the permalink changes. If i am incorrect i will take off the &#034;n comments&#034; part. I only included it because the plugin offered it, but i think it&#039;s a bit pointless really, as it is likely to be wrong whenever the feed hasn&#039;t updated yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http-36.livejournal.com-</title>
		<link>http://aimee.mychores.co.uk/2007/09/08/post/59/permalinks-and-comments/comment-page-1#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>http-36.livejournal.com-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 21:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aimee.mychores.co.uk/2007/09/08/post/59/#comment-163</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m commenting just to see if the feed on LJ updates. I thought that the way LJ and most feed scrapers work is to take one copy of each entry and treat changed entries as new posts. I know on other blogs I read if the comment is edited you get it again, so I&#039;ve seen two or more copies of the same but edited boingboing or neilgaiman posts on my friends page, however that might be because they&#039;re using a third party feed propagator or it&#039;s a feature of blogger to give edited posts new ids, or something.

so yeah, just being curious really...

&#039;Test.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m commenting just to see if the feed on LJ updates. I thought that the way LJ and most feed scrapers work is to take one copy of each entry and treat changed entries as new posts. I know on other blogs I read if the comment is edited you get it again, so I&#039;ve seen two or more copies of the same but edited boingboing or neilgaiman posts on my friends page, however that might be because they&#039;re using a third party feed propagator or it&#039;s a feature of blogger to give edited posts new ids, or something.</p>
<p>so yeah, just being curious really&#8230;</p>
<p>&#039;Test.&#039;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
